ALC 2011: Contractor versus Employee
The Association of Language Companies (ALC) puts on its annual conference in Las Vegas on May 18-21, 2011.
Contractor vs. Employee: Introduction to the Contract Interpreter Information Center (CIIC)
Bill Graeper (Certified Languages Internationals), Vic Marcus (Northwest Interpreters, Inc.), Francesco Pagano (Interpreters and Translators, Inc.)
Interpreters as Independent Contractors or Employees – this has been a hot topic for several years as federal, state, and local taxing bodies look to increase their revenue to help balance budgets.
- “Misclassification” is a hot topic, not only in the US, but also in Canada and Europe
- Many industries are targeted; construction industry in particular
- Who is after us? Federal and state government agencies facing budget crises and shortfalls; the primary purpose is tax collection; the primary focus is on Employment and Workers’ Comp
- Translators and interpreters by and large want to be independent contractors
- Bill Graeper has a blog on this issue at www.contractinterpreters.com
Contract Interpreter Information Center
- Includes translators
- Purpose: to promote contractor business model
- It is an informational website; focus: use of contractors in the language services industry, industry advocacy and support; education for all stakeholders
- Founding members: Certified Languages International, Northwest Interpreters, Interpreters and Translators, languagelink, Dynamic Language
- When audited, hire a professional (attorney specializing in labor law), reach out to CIIC members for assistance, be proactive – note reactive
The Connecticut Story
- In 1999, Interpreters and Translators, Inc. (ITI) was audited by the CT Department of Labor
- Audit was successful and the DoL conducted two more audits the next two years; audits were also successful
- In 2008, an interpreter made a claim for unemployment
- The DoL came back and requested records of all independent contractors; ITI hired an attorney
- ITI’s attorney found a similar case: Daws Critical Care Registry vs. State of Connecticut Department of Labor (CT Supreme Court case, cited in other states as well)
- The DoL reclassified the contractor with a claim as ITI’s employee and attempted to reclassify all interpreters used by ITI; the process took several years
- Citing the Daws Critical Care Registry case, ITI’s attorney was able to change the DoL’s attitude
Lessons Learned
- Keep your records clean by abiding with state and federal requirements for proper classification
- If you sense any heat, contact and retain an attorney right away
- Don’t allow any attorney to tell you “let it go”
- Encourage your contractors to get a business license